Evaluating psychological insight in a clinical sample using the Shedler-Westen assessment procedure.

نویسندگان

  • Meaghan E Lehmann
  • Mark J Hilsenroth
چکیده

Using the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP)-200 Q-Sort items in a large clinical sample of outpatients (N = 105), we developed the SWAP insight scale. The rationale, psychometric properties, and convergent validity of this insight scale are reported. Through factor analysis, six of the SWAP-200 items were identified as psychometrically optimal in the assessment of insight (presence or absence) with an alpha coefficient of 0.78. We examined the construct validity of this SWAP insight scale using independent clinical videotape ratings of the Capacity for Dynamic Process Scale, specifically the items "appears introspective" and "manifests insight." We also examined the relationship between the SWAP insight scale using independent clinical videotape ratings of the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale-Global Ratings, specifically ratings of "complexity of representations" and "social causality." The results demonstrated significant positive correlation between the SWAP insight scale and all five of these criterion measures. Partial correlations demonstrated that, even when the effects of global psychiatric severity are controlled for, the SWAP insight scale maintains a significant relationship with independent clinical videotape ratings of patients manifesting insight during sessions. Future research directions and clinical implications of the SWAP insight scale are discussed.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP): making personality diagnosis clinically meaningful.

There is a schism between science and practice in understanding and assessing personality. Approaches derived from the research laboratory often strike clinical practitioners as clinically naive and of dubious clinical relevance. Approaches derived from clinical observation and theory often strike empirical researchers as fanciful speculation. In this article, we describe an approach to persona...

متن کامل

Dimensions of personality and personality pathology: factor structure of the Shedler-Westen assessment procedure-II (SWAP-II).

Researchers have proposed replacing the current system for diagnosing personality disorders with a dimensional trait model. Proposed trait models have been derived primarily from data provided by untrained lay informants (often via self-report questionnaires) using item sets derived from lay conceptions of personality. An alternative is to derive personality trait dimensions from data provided ...

متن کامل

Refining a complex diagnostic construct: subtyping Dysthymia with the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure-II.

OBJECTIVE We sought to determine whether meaningful subtypes of Dysthymic patients could be identified when grouping them by similar personality profiles. METHOD A random, national sample of psychiatrists and clinical psychologists (n=1201) described a randomly selected current patient with personality pathology using the descriptors in the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure-II (SWAP-II), co...

متن کامل

Integrating Clinical and Empirical Perspectives on Personality: the Shedler–westen Assessment Procedure (swap)

One of the greatest challenges facing psychology and psychiatry is the schism between science and practice. The schism is especially pronounced when it comes to understanding personality. For skilled clinical practitioners, personality assessment generally means clinical case formulation: understanding the patterns of thinking, feeling, fantasizing, desiring, fearing, coping, defending, attachi...

متن کامل

Diagnostic Agreement Between Clinicians and Clients: The Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the SWAP-200 and MCMI-III Personality Disorder Scales.

A particularly controversial aspect in the field of personality assessment is the use of self-report measures, versus clinicians' evaluations, for diagnosing personality disorder (PD). No studies have systematically documented the agreement between these sources for the entire array of DSM-5 PDs using comprehensive measures and experienced clinicians' judgments. The present work fills this gap ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The Journal of nervous and mental disease

دوره 199 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011